Just curious about you Tim Connolly haters...
Would you take Bob Sanders on the Bills?
He's played 6, 15, 4, 14, 6 games in his career - missing more time than Connolly.
He's a great player when healthy, as is Connolly.
Without him, the Colts do not win the Super Bowl.
I would take both players. Is there anyone who would take one or not the other?
Bob Sanders did a whole lot of nothing last night....
Rey Maualuga didn't play that great against us in the Rose Bowl. Doesn't mean he isn't a great player.
The Common Man (01-04-2009)
Waiting for Thumper's "give it up" response.
When Connolley wins a Stanley Cup and an MVP award, then this argument will actually make sense.
Comparing Connolly to Sanders is stupid.
Uncle Jesse (01-04-2009)
You can't deny that when Connolly is in the lineup, the team is much better though.
Yeah, really. My first thoughts on this thread exactly.Originally Posted by dasaybz
Besides the fact you can have actual depth in the NFL. Having a roster of 50+ players compared to 20 helps.
The point was, though, without Sanders, the Colts aren't good enough defensively to go anywhere.
Without Connolly, neither are the Sabres, largely due to the lack of a playmaking center. If the Colts can get another bruising safety, then sure, Sanders becomes replaceable, just like if the Sabres can get another center, then getting rid of Connolly would be wise. For whatever reason, that option is not in the cards for either team, and they suffer because of it.
LALALALALALAFONTAINE (01-05-2009)
I like Connolly and want him back...but he's not as good as Bob Sanders.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
