He started the game on the 4th line. He was promoted off the 4th line after the first few shifts. I asked, what did he do on the 4th line to get promoted for the rest of the game? Regardless of when his game ended, he still got promoted. Why? Max never got promoted last year.Originally Posted by MauvaisSang
"The last eight weeks of performance have been below average and I believe a change in the direction at ice level is necessary," Gainey told a news conference. "Our team did not seem to be emotionally engaged."
He was on the ice for those two goals with who? Mair and Ellis? Does anybody have a shift chart?
"The last eight weeks of performance have been below average and I believe a change in the direction at ice level is necessary," Gainey told a news conference. "Our team did not seem to be emotionally engaged."
Do you even realize what you just responded to?
"The last eight weeks of performance have been below average and I believe a change in the direction at ice level is necessary," Gainey told a news conference. "Our team did not seem to be emotionally engaged."
Being benched for the entire 3rd period and having the 2nd least ice time of all skaters is not a fucking promotion.
And yes, Max did get time off the 4th line.
Regardless, your thread title is a lie. Can you at least admit that?
Stafford
Explain how getting benched constitutes a promotion.
Yes. I was mocking you.
Pigpen admit he was wrong? Never happen. He's just smarter and more astute than the rest of us mortals. Clearly you're too ignorant, and have your head shoved too far up Lindy's ass, to see how 22 seconds of ice time in the third period isn't a reward.
I wonder if Edmonton still wants him?Stafford
ahahahahahahahahah
that is all.
#24
pigpen still had credibility before this? Really? How and why?
#36
You were responding to a quote in the media relayed through an article in a newspaper. How were you mocking me exactly?
"The last eight weeks of performance have been below average and I believe a change in the direction at ice level is necessary," Gainey told a news conference. "Our team did not seem to be emotionally engaged."
He started the game on the 4th line. He did not play exclusively on the 4th line. Regardless of when he was benched, he was obviously promoted. And a good point was brought up in this thread. He was on the ice for two goals against. Who were his linemates on those two goals? Maybe letting him off the 4th line wasn't a good idea? I don't know. I didn't see a shift chart.
"The last eight weeks of performance have been below average and I believe a change in the direction at ice level is necessary," Gainey told a news conference. "Our team did not seem to be emotionally engaged."
I just watched the replays. He was on the ice for Ottawa's two goals.
Linemates on the first were Kennedy and Mac.
On the 2nd he was with Roy and Mac.
He started the game with Mair and Ellis.
"The last eight weeks of performance have been below average and I believe a change in the direction at ice level is necessary," Gainey told a news conference. "Our team did not seem to be emotionally engaged."
http://www.nhl.com/scores/htmlreport...0/PL020557.HTM
Now Stafford has been promoted to the press box.
LALALALALALAFONTAINE (12-27-2009), Thumper (12-27-2009)
Drew Stafford trade him
The Future QB?
Stafford did get a gift. All you can eat nachos.
#3
GERBE!!!75PTS (12-27-2009)
pigpen, when are you going to realize what a joke you make of yourself just about every time you crawl out from under your rock?
#36
See the thread about Macarthur running Fleury.
View Profile
View Forum Posts
Private Message
View Blog Entries
Reply With Quote
